Welcome to the Genomics Forum blog


Based at The University of Edinburgh, the ESRC Genomics Policy and Research Forum is part of the ESRC Genomics Network and pioneers new ways to promote and communicate social research on the contemporary life sciences.
Showing posts with label gene. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gene. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

EGN Conference 2013 – Parallel Two: Epigenetics



by Alan O'Connor, Research Student Cardiff Law School

#egn13

In the second set of parallel sessions on day one was the session on epigenetics.

Marcus Pembrey provided an introduction to the field of epigenetics.  He outlined a number of epigenetic mechanisms which are associated with regulating gene expression, including DNA methylation, histone modification and regulation by micro RNA.  DNA methylation involves the addition of a methyl group to certain parts of DNA.  Where this occurs in gene promoter regions, it has the effect of silencing gene expression.

While it was always assumed that there were some epigenetic mechanisms involved in cell development, a recent advance has been in linking epigenetic modifications to environmental factors.  In particular, Marcus pointed to a number of studies which demonstrate how epigenetic markers are affected by early life environment and early life socio-economic position.

John Dupré discussed the enduring nature of epigenetic changes, including the methods of epigenetic heritability and their impact on evolution.  The nature-nurture distinction has perhaps outlived its usefulness as the interrelationship of the inherited and the experienced becomes more evident.  Epigenetics seems to rule out the gene-centred determinism that underlies some neo-Darwinist accounts of evolution. Epigenetic mechanisms point to a mode of inheritance involving genetic, epigenetic and cultural elements.

There is debate surrounding the mechanism of epigenetic inheritance.  Some evidence suggests that that epigenetic changes may be heritable during cell division, but this is controversial.  Other inheritance mechanisms may involve new exposure to environmental factors which bring about epigenetic change with each generation. This appears to have been the case in studies of rat maternal grooming patterns.

Sometimes discussion of epigenetics induces claims of neo-Lamarckism, but John highlights that while epigenetic inheritance does suggest the inheritance of acquired characteristics, it does not claim selective acquisition of adaptive characteristics.

Ilina Singh addressed some of the social scientific questions arising as a result of emerging epigenetic knowledge.  As the influence of environmental factors on development becomes clearer, there will be a growing space for social scientists to add constructively to the investigation of epigenetic causes of disease.

Increasingly, conditions affecting adults may be seen as developmental disorders with their origins early in life.  An ecobiodevelopmental approach may be necessary to properly address the interrelatedness of genes and environment and to identify the relevant actors.

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

"Eyeless" in Aix

                     "This is What I See" becomes replaced by a question: "Is This What I See?"

Cezanne famously painted the same views over and over, obsessed with changes in light and atmosphere. As this residency goes on, and as I obsessively ask myself, over and over, "What is Genomics?" - I go through a rotation of answers. It's a set of techniques, it's the social and intellectual implications of those techniques - and I am eventually coming round to my own "perspective". Or rather, renunciation of any such thing.

Genomics is a way of seeing the world by being in it. It challenges ideas about scientific "reality" as something out there waiting to be discovered and both integrates "being" with "seeing" and renounces, like Cezanne did, the idea of mastery. Of the viewer as a one eyed stationary God looking at a world they do not inhabit.


Which brings me to "Eyeless".

Like most of the first identified genes, "Eyeless" is defined double negatively. It was the absence of "Eyeless" that made a fruitfly that was without eyes. It's on chomosome 4 of a fruitfly and was identified in the "Fly Room" - the Palo Alto lab of TH Morgan, the first great explorer of the connection between molecules found in the nuclei of cells...and how bodies were made, how those things we now call genes are "expressed."

In the 1990s, Eyeless in Fruitflies was one of the first genes to be sequenced and identified as being "homologous" with genes in...well...lots of things. Including us. These days, having sequenced the genomes of mice and people AND fruitflies (inter alia), we call it a Hox gene for short. Its ubiquity as a molecule in the cell, and as an eye making agent in developing animals as ancestrally diverse as flies and mice - whose last shared ancestor was kicking about a LOOOOOONNNNNGGGG time ago- argues for its extreme ancientness.

Indeed, the gene for making eyes may have been around, as a molecule (or bit of a molecule) for much longer than there have been things with sufficient complexity and size to grow an eye - or leg or spleen - at all.

The eye was once thought to be the proof above all of an intelligent designer. It turns out to be an elementary adaptation to light...at least as old and established as photosynthesis in the earliest plant life.

We - you and I - in this view, are accidental agglomerations of molecules that just happen to paint pictures and think thoughts - themselves activities no more or less miraculous than gravity and breathing.

Perspective...it's not reality. "Reality" is a place that only exists for animals big enough brained to imagine it. Making a theory, interpreting the points of light above our heads as distant-in-space/time nuclear reactors - may well be "accurate" or "useful" as ways of seeing.

But that is all they are, ways of seeing and imagining. And, in the case, here and now, of what we call"genomes", manipulating.

We only live twice...one life for ourselves, and one for our dreams.




Peter Arnott is Resident Playwright at the ESRC Genomics Forum April 2011 - April 2012. Appointed in partnership with the Traverse Theatre Edinburgh, Peter will be hosting a number of public engagements as he explores ideas and seeks inspiration for a genomics related play.

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Darwin, Dawkins and the Left

By Ken MacLeod - Genomics Forum Writer in Residence

A few months ago Chris Williams, an OU history lecturer and political activist whom I've known for years online, asked me to give this year's Darwin Memorial Lecture to the Leicester Secular Society. I suggested the topic because, a couple of years earlier, I'd put together a stash of notes and links for a blog post that I'd never quite got around to writing.
The event, at the Society's splendid Victorian red-brick Secular Hall on 13 February 2011, drew a large and lively audience, from that cross-section of radical England that you so often find in its socialist, secularist and peace movements. Their searching and informed questions often had me thinking fast on my feet.
Here's the gist of what I said - a longer version will no doubt appear on my own blog.